hidden hit counter
Welcome to WindowsForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Defrag - Page file - NTFS questions

 
   Windows XP (Home) -> Hardware RSS
Next:  Unable to install ADSL modem on SP2  
Author Message
vikhr

External


Since: Dec 13, 2004
Posts: 2



(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:35 am
Post subject: Defrag - Page file - NTFS questions
Archived from groups: microsoft>public>windowsxp>hardware (more info?)

I was wondering about defrag and the page files.

Defrag

Does anyone have any statistics on the performance gains? Personally, I
think that today's hard disk drives are so fast, that a difference between a
moderately fragmented drive and a defragmented one will be negligible. Has
anybody found reliable information on the net concerning this matter?

When I say moderately, I am refering to fragmentation being the result of an
average usage, ratehr than artificially fragmenting the drive just to prove
that it does have an effect on performance. Now that most systems use (or
ought to be using) NTFS, fragmentation is even less, so the performance
difference should be less too.

Page file

I have read countless articles about the page file, but I still haven't
figured a couple of things. I believe that a page file is needed even when
you have a huge amount of RAM installed, but i am looking for more
information regarding this matter. For instance, would it be advisable to
just turn it off and see if your system behaves better without it? Or is it
100% certain that it is better to have a page file regardless of the amount
of RAM installed.

NTFS

Can anybody reply the following? When you move, delete, create, rename files
etc, the changes must be written to the MFT (assuming NTFS). Does Windows XP
cache any part of the MFT, does it group maybe such activities to accelerate
them, or does it have to access the MFT every single time? Again, a reliable
resource will be appreciated.

Thank you in advance.

Fleur de Coin
- http://www.fleur-de-coin.com/
Ελληνικός στρατός
- http://skopia.digitalrice.com/

 >> Stay informed about: Defrag - Page file - NTFS questions 
Back to top
Login to vote
Yves Leclerc

External


Since: Apr 13, 2004
Posts: 921



(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:35 am
Post subject: Re: Defrag - Page file - NTFS questions [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Defrag is still recommended. I have seen system that were "crawling" along
speed up after a defrag.

Please note: Windows XP built-in defrag utility does not seem to be able to
defrag the XP pgae file.


Page File has been part of every Windows (since 3.11.) Some people say you
do not need if if you have huge amounts of RAM but MS states that you need
it. I still am not sure which is right!.


"yandr" <vikhr DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cpk8vd$3j9$1@newsmaster.public.dc.hol.net...
 >I was wondering about defrag and the page files.
 >
 > Defrag
 >
 > Does anyone have any statistics on the performance gains? Personally, I
 > think that today's hard disk drives are so fast, that a difference between
 > a moderately fragmented drive and a defragmented one will be negligible.
 > Has anybody found reliable information on the net concerning this matter?
 >
 > When I say moderately, I am refering to fragmentation being the result of
 > an average usage, ratehr than artificially fragmenting the drive just to
 > prove that it does have an effect on performance. Now that most systems
 > use (or ought to be using) NTFS, fragmentation is even less, so the
 > performance difference should be less too.
 >
 > Page file
 >
 > I have read countless articles about the page file, but I still haven't
 > figured a couple of things. I believe that a page file is needed even when
 > you have a huge amount of RAM installed, but i am looking for more
 > information regarding this matter. For instance, would it be advisable to
 > just turn it off and see if your system behaves better without it? Or is
 > it 100% certain that it is better to have a page file regardless of the
 > amount of RAM installed.
 >
 > NTFS
 >
 > Can anybody reply the following? When you move, delete, create, rename
 > files etc, the changes must be written to the MFT (assuming NTFS). Does
 > Windows XP cache any part of the MFT, does it group maybe such activities
 > to accelerate them, or does it have to access the MFT every single time?
 > Again, a reliable resource will be appreciated.
 >
 > Thank you in advance.
 >
 > Fleur de Coin
<font color=purple> > - <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.fleur-de-coin.com/</font" target="_blank">http://www.fleur-de-coin.com/</font</a>>
 > Ελληνικός στρατός
<font color=purple> > - <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://skopia.digitalrice.com/</font" target="_blank">http://skopia.digitalrice.com/</font</a>>
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: Defrag - Page file - NTFS questions 
Back to top
Login to vote
R. C. White1

External


Since: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 320



(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Defrag - Page file - NTFS questions [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Hi, yandr.

Have you read MVP Alex Nichol's article?

Virtual Memory in Windows XP
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.php" target="_blank">http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.php</a>

RC

"yandr" <vikhr.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cpk8vd$3j9$1@newsmaster.public.dc.hol.net...
 >I was wondering about defrag and the page files.
 >
 > Defrag
 >
 > Does anyone have any statistics on the performance gains? Personally, I
 > think that today's hard disk drives are so fast, that a difference between
 > a moderately fragmented drive and a defragmented one will be negligible.
 > Has anybody found reliable information on the net concerning this matter?
 >
 > When I say moderately, I am refering to fragmentation being the result of
 > an average usage, ratehr than artificially fragmenting the drive just to
 > prove that it does have an effect on performance. Now that most systems
 > use (or ought to be using) NTFS, fragmentation is even less, so the
 > performance difference should be less too.
 >
 > Page file
 >
 > I have read countless articles about the page file, but I still haven't
 > figured a couple of things. I believe that a page file is needed even when
 > you have a huge amount of RAM installed, but i am looking for more
 > information regarding this matter. For instance, would it be advisable to
 > just turn it off and see if your system behaves better without it? Or is
 > it 100% certain that it is better to have a page file regardless of the
 > amount of RAM installed.
 >
 > NTFS
 >
 > Can anybody reply the following? When you move, delete, create, rename
 > files etc, the changes must be written to the MFT (assuming NTFS). Does
 > Windows XP cache any part of the MFT, does it group maybe such activities
 > to accelerate them, or does it have to access the MFT every single time?
 > Again, a reliable resource will be appreciated.
 >
 > Thank you in advance.
 >
 > Fleur de Coin
<font color=purple> > - <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.fleur-de-coin.com/</font" target="_blank">http://www.fleur-de-coin.com/</font</a>>
 > Ελληνικός στρατός
<font color=purple> > - <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://skopia.digitalrice.com/</font" target="_blank">http://skopia.digitalrice.com/</font</a>><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Defrag - Page file - NTFS questions 
Back to top
Login to vote
vikhr

External


Since: Dec 13, 2004
Posts: 2



(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:35 am
Post subject: Re: Defrag - Page file - NTFS questions [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Yes and it is an excellent article, but I wish someone had found more
information about the specific issues I would like to know (I have read
countless articles online, but haven't made up my mind 100%).

Fleur de Coin
- <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.fleur-de-coin.com/" target="_blank">http://www.fleur-de-coin.com/</a>
????????? st?at??
- <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://skopia.digitalrice.com/" target="_blank">http://skopia.digitalrice.com/</a>

"R. C. White" <rc RemoveThis @corridor.net> wrote in message
news:%23%23V0rZV4EHA.2540@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
 > Hi, yandr.
 >
 > Have you read MVP Alex Nichol's article?
 >
 > Virtual Memory in Windows XP
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.php</font" target="_blank">http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.php</font</a>>
 >
 > RC
 >
 > "yandr" <vikhr RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
 > news:cpk8vd$3j9$1@newsmaster.public.dc.hol.net...
  >>I was wondering about defrag and the page files.
  >>
  >> Defrag
  >>
  >> Does anyone have any statistics on the performance gains? Personally, I
  >> think that today's hard disk drives are so fast, that a difference
  >> between a moderately fragmented drive and a defragmented one will be
  >> negligible. Has anybody found reliable information on the net concerning
  >> this matter?
  >>
  >> When I say moderately, I am refering to fragmentation being the result of
  >> an average usage, ratehr than artificially fragmenting the drive just to
  >> prove that it does have an effect on performance. Now that most systems
  >> use (or ought to be using) NTFS, fragmentation is even less, so the
  >> performance difference should be less too.
  >>
  >> Page file
  >>
  >> I have read countless articles about the page file, but I still haven't
  >> figured a couple of things. I believe that a page file is needed even
  >> when you have a huge amount of RAM installed, but i am looking for more
  >> information regarding this matter. For instance, would it be advisable to
  >> just turn it off and see if your system behaves better without it? Or is
  >> it 100% certain that it is better to have a page file regardless of the
  >> amount of RAM installed.
  >>
  >> NTFS
  >>
  >> Can anybody reply the following? When you move, delete, create, rename
  >> files etc, the changes must be written to the MFT (assuming NTFS). Does
  >> Windows XP cache any part of the MFT, does it group maybe such activities
  >> to accelerate them, or does it have to access the MFT every single time?
  >> Again, a reliable resource will be appreciated.
  >>
  >> Thank you in advance.
  >>
  >> Fleur de Coin
<font color=green>  >> - <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.fleur-de-coin.com/</font" target="_blank">http://www.fleur-de-coin.com/</font</a>>
  >> Ελληνικός στρατός
<font color=green>  >> - <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://skopia.digitalrice.com/</font" target="_blank">http://skopia.digitalrice.com/</font</a>>
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Defrag - Page file - NTFS questions 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
NTFS file system on ext. USB drive? - The title says it. I don't have my new drive yet, but would like to format a new external USB 250GB hard disk with the NTFS system. I want to get around the 4GB file size limitation of FAT32. I have been told that I won't be able to do it. If I can, ...

What can possibly cause XP to lose NTFS file system? - Now that this has happened to two consecutive hard drives, I'm becoming really paranoid... Short story version: I use XP (SP2) Disk Management to format a WD 180GB ATA drive as a single NTFS partition using 64K clusters (for video recordings). I copy..

NTFS and W98 - I just got a Western Digital 320 Gig external HDD and use it mainly on my XP-based desktop. I've got a notebook PC, as well, running W98 and after getting the HDD installed on it too, it's not showing up in the list of drives. The HDD is running NTFS...

RAMDISK on NTFS - I have installed a RAMDISK on windows XP using the NTFS File System. The Ramdisk will not work is there a file that I need to change the security settings on to make it work. I have installed a RAMDISK on windows xp using FAT32 file system and it..

DVD Drive Questions - Hello. I am very new to computers and I would appreciate any help. I just bought this product: A Dell 8X/4X/12X DVD+RW and 32X/16X/40X CD-RW Internal Combo Drive for Dell Dimension 2350 / 2400 and 4600 System My two questions are 1) What program...
   Windows XP (Home) -> Hardware All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum

Categories:
  Windows XP
 Win 2000/NT/98/ME
 Windows Vista!


[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]