hidden hit counter
Welcome to WindowsForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

GPO Inheritence

  
   Win 2000/NT/98/ME (Home) -> Group Policy RSS
Next:  Multiple Windows OPen  
Author Message
createshare

External


Since: Nov 27, 2004
Posts: 5



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 8:23 am
Post subject: GPO Inheritence
Archived from groups: microsoft>public>win2000>group_policy (more info?)
I have tow OUs with two GPOs in windows 2003 Server.

Domain.com
OU-1
OU-2

Is it neccessary to select "block policy inheritence" and "No Override"
options for both OUs to make them work properly?

thanks!

 >> Stay informed about: GPO Inheritence 
Back to top
Login to vote
user5758

External


Since: Jan 30, 2005
Posts: 94



(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 4:38 pm
Post subject: Re: GPO Inheritence [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Hi,

create_share schrieb:
> [...] Is it neccessary to select "block policy inheritence" and "No Override"
> options for both OUs to make them work properly?

No. They follow each other and merge in the end. Following settings
override existing one (if the ydefine the same policy setting).
Itīs like the way most applications work: Last writer wins.

Mark
--
Mark Heitbrink - MVP Windows Server - Group Policy

Homepage: www.gruppenrichtlinien.de - deutsch
Blog: gpupdate.spaces.live.com - english

 >> Stay informed about: GPO Inheritence 
Back to top
Login to vote
createshare

External


Since: Nov 27, 2004
Posts: 5



(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:19 am
Post subject: Re: GPO Inheritence [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Ok Thanks!

"Mark Heitbrink [MVP]" wrote:

> Hi,
>
> create_share schrieb:
> > [...] Is it neccessary to select "block policy inheritence" and "No Override"
> > options for both OUs to make them work properly?
>
> No. They follow each other and merge in the end. Following settings
> override existing one (if the ydefine the same policy setting).
> ItÂīs like the way most applications work: Last writer wins.
>
> Mark
> --
> Mark Heitbrink - MVP Windows Server - Group Policy
>
> Homepage: www.gruppenrichtlinien.de - deutsch
> Blog: gpupdate.spaces.live.com - english
>
 >> Stay informed about: GPO Inheritence 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
never mind I found it - I forgot to check in options "do not override" Thanks for reading... RW

gp for screen saver - I was looking for solution how to force "lock-up" clients in domain after let say 10 minutes of inactivities... and what I've learn is the only option is to enable password protected screen server via GPO... and here is my problem, Am applyi...

How to use Local Policies - Hello, I'am installing a set of 20 computers in a school. All with Windows 2000 Prof. There is no Domain Server. In every computer there is 2 users: "Administrator" and "StudentX" I need to know if i can use Group Policy Management to...

best value - what is the best value shoulde be set it in my group police for: 1-Account lockout duraction 2-Account lockout threshold 3-reset account lockout counter after

ImpersonateUser - what's that then? - I'm getting in my Userenv.log of my Windows 2000 pro client the following bizarre messages (logging into a NT4 domain): ImpersonateUser: Failed to impersonate user with 5. Is this important or not? Can some kind person tell me what this is? :-) ..
   Win 2000/NT/98/ME (Home) -> Group Policy All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
 You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Categories:
 Windows XP
  Win 2000/NT/98/ME
 Windows Vista!

[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]